We were Christi Masi, Miles Ohlrich, Andrew Feucht and me.
Why I loved Trioba 2009 sprint race? Because of maps. They added trails that were necessary for navigation to happen to the USGS topo map. The printouts were actually nice quality and I could read it well. And it is extremely important for an 8-12 hour sprint race.
For a short sprint race like that an issue with the maps or misplaced checkpoints which makes you lose half an hour just destroys the race since suddenly you depend on luck rather than skill; that is exactly what happened with team Verve on both days of Crux and Crucible.
The maps were of horrible quality: USGS topo maps printed out from National Geographic software. Ever tried that? Good for entertainment, horrible for racing. Ever tried to put on checkpoint markers on that? The best you can get is small flags. No O' style circles. Really sweet. That's why lazy race director's choose to give UTM coordinates out instead.
Let me give you an example of our issues using a topo map fragment from gmap-pedometer site. CP3 is mandatory CP, CP5 is optional.

The road leading first North and then East, turning into a 4WD road had the usual red paint from National Geographic on it a bit further than the road continues (no red color at the all wheel drive part of it). The page of the map ended a bit above CP 5 (so we had to turn to the other side there and I did not have lots of time to look at it) and I did not see the trail. Nor did Miles... So we chose to go on the road which leads to the top to the East at once. Not sure if we found the correct road, but we found one. Once up at CP3 the next thinking was to go a bit North and then head down and come back up for the CP5, leaving our bikes on top. Another logical choice could be going more North and then contouring around. But looking at the contourlines my first thought was that it is not a good idea - travel on possibly very steep surface with really thick growth is a bad idea to me.
So we go down and surprise! there is a road here.

What is the result and how much do we lose here? Well, I chose to carry the bike up, 30 minutes, carry down 15 minutes. Go down for CP5 - 20 minutes, the same up. together 1:25. If the situation was as in the topo map: 15 minutes going around (some bushwack on 4wd included), drop bikes, 15 up for the CP2 w/o bike 20 minutes down to CP5, 20 minutes to get back to bikes on slope. 1:10 if reality corresponded to map. However, CP5 is on road. So suddenly there is no coming back on slope. You just come back from CP2 to bikes. and get CP5 in zero time. So 50 minutes. Voila! We just lost like 35 minutes. 15 minutes on bad map reading, 20 on bad map. Pretty horrible. Plus some additional thinking time while trying to figure out the roads.
But wait, there's more. Optional CP4. We plot the points, race director checks them and then moves CP4 a bit to the left, possibly to the turn in the road as in the next map the point on left. In the map given to us the Jeep trail in the picture has the usual road symbol and it ends somewhere between the middle of right circle and the road to the east. In reality it seemed like a well overgrown, but certainly noticable road.
We were like 20 people moving around there for probably 20 minutes and noone finding it, finally us leaving. Nike confirmed with RD that he had "issues" with this point by radio, before everyone left not finding the point. How could this happen? Turns out he used GPS to find where he was when putting out the CP, got bad GPS signal and gave us wrong UTM coordinates, then proceeded with repairing himself on the map that the point is more to the left; when I heard him do that I thought we had misplotted the point... Where was the point? I believe it was even more to the West, one team found it.Was there more? Well, closing in to the kayaks some 10k to the North we were making route choices based on direction since there was nothing of the roads in the map, hoping they would lead us home. Luckily they did, although I would not have been surprised had they lead us to the top of one of the Sisters hills and stopped there.
How was second day? Much easier navigation with approximate choices only in the very end of the race at Farragut State Park. Lost 20 minutes looking for the top of rocks, but that was my bad. And some 15 more looking for a CP on the "edge of clearing", which could not be seen from it.
Consensus? I guess it would be different if it had been a 24 hour non stop race. Half an hour here or there, sure. But in 12 hours where you are racing sooooo close to Nike and True Grit precision is important, 30 minutes of luck instead of skill and the race is done. And there was way too much biking.
oh, ps.
There was more stupidness with this race: people called to ask RD about the hard to find points/misplaced CPs, at least one team was leaving people at the road while others were looking for the CP, no punishment on them, first day kayak cutoff time of 4pm was increased to 5pm. This is especially interesting since we tried to reach Crux and turned back since we could not make it to 4pm. 5pm could be reachable for us. Two teams made Crux, but I would really love to see their splits. I fear at least one had trouble reaching kayaks by 4pm, they could have been really really close. Oh, there is even more - there was a mandatory CP in the town which everyone took on the way out, but it was supposed to be taken when coming back on kayak. Volunteers at the last TA said it had to be taken for sure again and we did it. Some teams did not for sure. What does mandatory mean to you? I guess it is a meaningless word.
pps.
results: http://www.adventuresportsweek.com/main.asp?pID=147. Miles' blog entry here:
http://nevernevermiles.blogspot.com/2009/06/crux-and-crucible-adventure-race.html.
Congratulations go to Ian, Jared and Roger, winning the second day.
ppps.
I guess I'm just disappointed we did not win. I will not do a Big Blue race any more.